[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMillspaugh, Joshua J.eng
dc.contributor.authorKolar, Jesse Leeeng
dc.coverage.spatialNorth Dakotaeng
dc.date.issued2009eng
dc.date.submitted2009 Springeng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on September 9, 2010).eng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionThesis advisor: Dr. Joshua J. Millspaugh.eng
dc.descriptionM.S. University of Missouri--Columbia 2009.eng
dc.description.abstractWildlife managers need pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) movement data in North Dakota because harvest quotas are based on a summer survey, which might not represent the distribution of pronghorn during the fall hunting season. Using data from 121 radio-collared pronghorn, we quantified migration dates, distance, direction and site fidelity for pronghorn in North Dakota, 2004-2008. Nearly half (45%) of the pronghorn were migratory, moving [greater than] 15 km between winter and summer ranges. Of the migratory pronghorn, 89% moved northeast in the spring, and 97% moved southwest in the fall. Pronghorn showed higher fidelity to summer ranges than winter ranges. Few fall migrations occurred between the survey and the hunting season; therefore, during our years of study, the survey accurately reflected unit occupancy of pronghorn for the hunting season. It is also important to identify pronghorn seasonal habitat use to guide land management decisions, inform mitigation processes and identify limited resources. We modeled summer and winter resource selection for 50 GPS-collared, female adult pronghorn in North Dakota, 2005-2008. We used vegetation type, ruggedness and distance to nearest roads as predictors. During both seasons, pronghorn selected open vegetation types in non-rugged habitat. Primary roads were avoided in the summer and secondary roads were avoided during both seasons. Reduction of open vegetation, or increased road developments, in non-rugged areas where habitat is limited, might decrease the suitability of available pronghorn habitat.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentx, 72 pageseng
dc.identifier.oclc697532155eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/9657eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/9657
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
dc.subject.lcshPronghorn -- Seasonal distributioneng
dc.subject.lcshPronghorn -- Migrationeng
dc.subject.lcshPronghorn -- Habitateng
dc.titlePronghorn migration and resource selection in southwestern North Dakotaeng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineFisheries and wildlife sciences (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelMasterseng
thesis.degree.nameM.S.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record