[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPetrocik, John R., 1944-eng
dc.contributor.authorGooch, Donald Michael, 1975-eng
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Stateseng
dc.date.issued2009eng
dc.date.submitted2009 Falleng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on January 26, 2011).eng
dc.descriptionThesis advisor: Dr. John R. Petrocik.eng
dc.descriptionPh. D. University of Missouri--Columbia 2009.eng
dc.description.abstractPolitical polarization in the American electorate has received a great deal of attention in recent years with most of the research focusing on social issues and their impact on electoral outcomes. However, scant attention has been paid to polarization on other issue dimensions and the mass-elite affects on polarization. I develop several empirical measures of political polarization: variance to assess the spread of opinion and kurtosis as a measure of bimodality. I assess polarization using ANES and GSS cumulative data from 1970 - 2008 on several prominent social issues such as abortion, women's equality, affirmative action, and non-social issues such as government jobs programs and defense spending. I examine public opinion polarization as well as the relationship between mass public opinion and elite public opinion using D-W nominate scores as a measure of elite opinion. I find there is significant polarization of social and non-social policy opinion, both in terms of the average public preferred level of government action in these areas and the conflict over it. Contrary to the consensus in the literature, I find that elite opinion is responsive to mass opinion and that there is a recursive relationship between mass and elite ideology.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentxvi, 426 pageseng
dc.identifier.oclc698377524eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/9882eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/9882
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
dc.subject.lcshPolarization (Social sciences)eng
dc.subject.lcshPolitical scienceeng
dc.subject.lcshCulture conflicteng
dc.subject.lcshElectionseng
dc.titleThe culture wars & political polarization in perspective : why polarization and its perturbations are a persistant [i.e., persistent] puzzle in political scienceeng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical science (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelDoctoraleng
thesis.degree.namePh. D.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record