[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSwan, Shanna H.eng
dc.contributor.authorMain, Katharinaeng
dc.contributor.authorKruse, Robin L.eng
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Saraeng
dc.contributor.authorRedmon, J. Bruceeng
dc.contributor.authorTernand, Christine L.eng
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Shannoneng
dc.date.issued2006eng
dc.descriptionReproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives. DOI:10.1289/ehp.114-a20eng
dc.description.abstractSwan et al. respond to several points made by McEwen and Renner regarding their recent study comparing anogenital distance (AGD) as a measure of androgen action in humans.eng
dc.identifier.citationSwan SH, Main K, Kruse R, Stewart S, Redmon B, Ternand C, et al. 2006. Anogenital Distance and Phthalate Exposure: Swan et al. Respond. Environmental Health Perspectives 114:A20-A21.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/9984eng
dc.publisherNational Institute of Environmental Health Scienceseng
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Sciences publications (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. College of Arts and Sciences. Division of Biological Scienceseng
dc.source.harvestedhttp://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info%3Adoi%2F10.1289%2Fehp.114-a20#b6-ehp0114-a00020eng
dc.subject.lcshPhthalate esterseng
dc.subject.lcshAndrogenseng
dc.subject.lcshPrenatal influenceseng
dc.titleAnogenital Distance and Phthalate Exposure: Swan et al. Respondeng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record