[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYoungstrom, Saraheng
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Researcheng
dc.contributor.meetingnameUndergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (2004 : University of Missouri--Columbia)eng
dc.date.issued2004eng
dc.descriptionAbstract only availableeng
dc.descriptionFaculty Mentor: Dr. Candace Galen, Biological Scienceseng
dc.description.abstractPhototropins are blue-light photoreceptors that control shoot and root phototropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. We investigated whether the soil environment influences the benefit of phototropism. We hypothesized that root phototropism should improve survival and growth under dry soil conditions, but not under wet conditions. We used a greenhouse experiment to test whether phototropism under dim light benefits plants in drought conditions. Seed of two non-phototropic (phot 1, nph3) mutants and wildtype A. thaliana (Columbia ecotype) were planted into a range of soil moisture regimes created by altering the sand content in the soil and varying the watering schedule. The soil water content varied from 26%-65% (w/w) mainly due to the sand content. Seedling size (rosette diameter) was measured three weeks after germination. We found several significant results. First, seedling emerged earlier in wet soil (11.5+/- 4.3 days after planting) then dry soil (15.3 +/- 5.6 d). Second, wild type plants were significantly larger than the mutant genotypes, but the magnitude of the size advantage depended on the soil environment. In sandy soil the wild type plants were 20% larger then the non-phototropic mutant plants (P<0.0001), and in the clay soil, the wild type plants were only 12% larger then the non-phototropic mutant plants(P<0.01). These results agree with previous findings that the growth advantage associated with phototropism increases in dry conditions. These results led us to wonder what was happening below the soil surface. We asked do nonphototropic plants differ from wild type in their rooting profiles, due to impaired root phototropism of mutant genotypes. We tested this idea in another greenhouse experiment in which the same genotypes were grown under dry and wet soils resembling the moisture extremes of the first experiment. Seeds were planted along the sides of clear plastic window boxes to enable us to track the roots. All sides except the top of the boxes were wrapped in foil to prevent light from entering. One month later, the boxes were unwrapped and the roots traced to determine the length and distance that each had traveled through the soil. Measurements are currently in progress.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipMU Monsanto Undergraduate Research Fellowshipeng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/716eng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Researcheng
dc.relation.ispartof2004 Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Research. Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forumeng
dc.subjectblue-light photoreceptorseng
dc.subjectArabidopsis thalianaeng
dc.subjectroot phototropismeng
dc.subjectmutant genotypeseng
dc.titleGoing underground: Benefits of phototropism in Arabidopsis depend on the soil environment [abstract]eng
dc.typeAbstracteng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record