Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • Graduate School - MU Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Dissertations (MU)
    • 2024 Dissertations (MU)
    • 2024 MU Dissertations - Freely available online
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • Graduate School - MU Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Dissertations (MU)
    • 2024 Dissertations (MU)
    • 2024 MU Dissertations - Freely available online
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    Foreign policy issue ownership, interstate conflict, and U.S. vote intention

    Kopp, Heather Michelle
    View/Open
    [PDF] KoppHeatherResearch.pdf (2.162Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Format
    Thesis
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    The literature on issue ownership shows that voters use ownership opinions when evaluating parties on salient issues. The audience costs literature shows that interstate conflict can significantly affect voter behavior. Due to these topics being studied in isolation from one another, it is unclear how foreign policy issue ownership interacts with interstate conflict to affect voter behavior. Using a formal model explaining voters' utility for the incumbent party, I theorize that the effect of foreign policy issue ownership will be larger in the presence of certain voter-level, party-level, and system-level traits. To examine the relationship between foreign policy and conflict on voting behavior, I first explore 1939-2020 U.S. public opinion data using numerous U.S. surveys and data from the Most Important Problem Dataset (MIPD). I find that more voters think foreign policy is salient around periods of time when the U.S. is involved in conflict. Examining trends in ownership, I find that foreign policy issue ownership changes hands between the Democratic and Republican Party over time. To test the formal model, I then use individual-level data from numerous U.S. surveys ranging from 1948 to 2016. To varying degrees of support, logistic regression results show that voters' utility for the incumbent party is higher when the incumbent party owns foreign policy and when respondents are conservative and Republican, when respondents think foreign policy is the MIP, when incumbent parties are Republican and hawkish, and when interstate conflict is severe, fatal, and fought over regime change. These findings support hypotheses regarding when foreign policy and foreign policy issue ownership is salient to voters. Thus, this dissertation contributes to our understanding of when voters use foreign policy ownership perceptions to evaluate incumbent parties and how the effect of these perceptions vary across types of voters, parties, and interstate conflicts.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/10355/105903
    https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/105903
    Degree
    Ph. D.
    Thesis Department
    Political science (MU)
    Collections
    • Political Science electronic theses and dissertations (MU)
    • 2024 MU Dissertations - Freely available online

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems