[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSchwain, Kristin, 1971-eng
dc.contributor.authorEmbry, Alanaeng
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Stateseng
dc.date.issued2008eng
dc.date.submitted2008 Springeng
dc.descriptionThe entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionTitle from title screen of research.pdf file (viewed on July 13, 2009)eng
dc.description"Student withdrew illustrations."eng
dc.descriptionThesis (M. A.) University of Missouri-Columbia 2008.eng
dc.description.abstract[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT REQUEST OF AUTHOR.] Since its official creation in 1777, the American flag has come to symbolize the Constitution, United States history, and personal political values. In the 1960s and 70s, the government attempted to limit flag display to a patriotic symbolism in response to mass protests over the Vietnam War and civil rights. Its attempt to control the image and meaning of the flag led citizens to use the flag to fight for freedom of speech, a freedom that the flag supposedly represented. The attempt to restrict usage of the American flag as an object and an image resulted in citizens and artists alike grasping for control over their national emblem and its meaning. With the Civil Rights Movement, the sixties and seventies brought widespread change as artists explored issues of personal and group identity in a culturally diverse nation. The following chapters consider the artists Jasper Johns, Wayne Eagleboy, Massimo Vignelli, and Faith Ringgold, who used the image of the flag to respond to the nation's controversy surrounding the flag's symbolic meaning and debated over problems concerning what it means to be American. Issues of disunity, inequality, injustice, diversity and lack of freedoms took the place of traditional meanings associated with the flag. I analyze their work from a multicultural perspective to exhibit the various ways the flag communicated and challenged American ideals.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.identifier.merlinb70517459eng
dc.identifier.oclc424624048eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/6070eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/6070
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsAccess is limited to the campus of the University of Missouri--Columbia.eng
dc.sourceSubmitted by University of Missouri--Columbia Graduate School.eng
dc.subject.lcshFlags -- Historyeng
dc.titleAmending the American flag : artistic liberties in the nineteen sixties and seventieseng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineArt history and archaeology (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelMasterseng
thesis.degree.nameM.A.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record