[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKerns, John Gerald, 1971-eng
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Melanie A.eng
dc.date.issued2009eng
dc.date.submitted2009 Springeng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on December 18, 2009).eng
dc.descriptionThesis advisor: Dr. John Kerns.eng
dc.descriptionM.A. University of Missouri--Columbia 2009.eng
dc.description.abstractCognitive strategies can be used to regulate emotion. For example, thinking about the specific details of an emotional situation (i.e., specific thinking strategy) decreases negative affect (Philippot et al., 2006). However, exactly how and why this cognitive strategy is effective is still unclear. There is also indirect evidence for an inverse relationship between cognitive control and emotion. This study examined whether (a) engagement of cognitive control (CC) results in decreased negative affect (NA); (b) whether CC is involved in the specific thinking strategy; and (c) whether negative mood also results in poorer CC performance. In this study, NA was elicited by a public speaking task. This study involved four groups: (1) a specific thinking group, expected to exhibit a decrease in negative affect; (2) a cognitive control group (performance of the OSPAN task); (3) an overgeneralized thinking group, which has not been found to decrease NA; and (4) a non-emotional control group. Subsequently, all groups performed the Stroop task. Performance of a second in a series of CC tasks has been found to produce poorer performance (possibly due to resource depletion). The cognitive control group did not decrease in NA after engaging CC. Further, there was suggestive evidence that the specific thinking group engaged CC, but no evidence to support that engaging CC decreased NA. Finally, NA was not found to decrease performance on CC tasks. These findings support that CC may not directly decrease NA and NA may not decrease CC.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentvi, 56 pageseng
dc.identifier.merlinb73263904eng
dc.identifier.oclc489705815eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/6543eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/6543
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertations. Theses. 2009 Theseseng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
dc.subject.lcshEmotions and cognitioneng
dc.subject.lcshAnxietyeng
dc.titleEngagement of cognitive control and down-regulation of negative affecteng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychological sciences (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelMasterseng
thesis.degree.nameM.A.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record