Functions in contemporary secondary mathematics textbook series in the United States

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

Functions in contemporary secondary mathematics textbook series in the United States

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/14225

[+] show full item record


Title: Functions in contemporary secondary mathematics textbook series in the United States
Author: Ross, Daniel J.
Keywords: mathematics curriculum
textbook evaluation
functions (mathematical)
secondary education
Date: 2011
Publisher: University of Missouri--Columbia
Abstract: Textbooks play a central role in US mathematics classrooms (Stein, Remillard, & Smith, 2007) and functions are a key topic in secondary mathematics (Carlson, Jacobs, Coe, Larsen, & Hsu, 2002). This study presents results from an analysis of this essential topic in the latest editions of three textbook series: the Glencoe Mathematics series, the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project series, and the Core-Plus Mathematics Project series. In each series, functions were examined in four areas: language used, presence of functions, core features, and ancillary features. Language used in definitions generally indicated univalence, arbitrariness, and universal quantification, but beyond these there was little consistency. Function examples were prevalent in all series. Examples were most often represented with equations or formulas and were predominantly polynomial functions, and especially linear. They mostly appeared in homework exercises and in abstract settings. Most examples were not actually identified as functions, explicit recommendations for using technology with examples were relatively infrequent, and opportunities for students to generate function examples or explore non-examples were limited. All series did include multiple representations of functions with examples, and many examples included verbal descriptions. These findings can provide valuable information for administrators and teachers using or selecting textbooks and curriculum developers as they plan new or revised textbooks. They also serve as an initial stage for research into how curriculum influences student learning of function.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/14225
Other Identifiers: RossD-072811-D179

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[+] show full item record